Apparently, regulators in Britain don’t think the price of biosimilar products is low enough. According to a consultation, “the average price decline upon loss of exclusivity is significantly lower for biological medicines than for non-biological medicines, with a ~70% average drop in expenditure for non-biological medicines compared to a ~45% drop for biological medicines.” One of the issues here is using averages. According to Warwick Smith, of the British Biosimilars Association, “we have seen price reductions of more than 80% for some products” and “these proposed changes will significantly impact biosimilars and manufacturers may be unable to launch products as a consequence. This could also impact the potential patient benefits of these medicines and threaten Simon Stevens’ objective of £300 million of savings in the next three years.” Everyone, simmer down and remember no biosimilars, no cost savings – period.
How would you feel about taking a biosimilar drug?
Maybe tobacco can redeem itself for its bad reputation as being an addictive, cancer-causing vice. It turns out, a tobacco plant-based platform for biomanufacturing may be able to make monoclonal antibodies at just 10% of the cost it takes using mammalian cell line systems. PlantPraxis, a joint venture between the Brazilian company Axis Biotech Brasil and the Canadian biotech PlantForm Corporation, is breaking ground on a pilot production facility in Rio de Janeiro to aid in the development of a biosimilar for AbbVie’s Humira (adalimumab) in addition to other biologics in their pipeline. What is even better than saving tons of money? Saving time; and the plant-based platform can do that too, along with unlimited scale-up capabilities. Don’t sell the tobacco farm just yet…
If you thought the FDA was going to make proving biosimilar interchangeability a piece of cake…think again. Shocking, we know. Much to the delight of those who manufacture originator biologics, the FDA released its fairly stringent biosimilar interchangeability guidance last week. Folks, it ain’t gonna be easy. In order for a branded prescription to be switched out for a biosimilar without a doctor’s thumbs up, interchangeability with the original product has to be proven with complex switching studies. Unfortunately for biosim makers, many studies currently underway do not meet these switching study requirements. Hooray for innovation! Bummer for affordability.
How often does the US Supreme Court hear a case involving the pharmaceutical industry? We don’t know, but it’s not every day, of that we are pretty sure. Just last week the US Solicitor General (sounds made up, right?) called on the Supreme Court to review the six-month delays to biosimilar launches. Believe it or not, after (yes, after) the FDA gives the okay for a company to start marketing a biosimilar, the originator company has six additional months to identify any potential patent claims. Translation: originator companies get at least six more months of patent exclusivity. Translation of the translation: mucho dinero. So, yes, this is a big deal for the entire healthcare system in the US.
Maybe you should talk to your doctor to see if a HealthyDose™ of biosimilars is right for you. Side effects include: euphoria caused by an acute awareness of feeling yourself getting smarter, accusations of being a know-it-all by your colleagues, and more euphoria due to objectively knowing you are in fact smarter than your colleagues.
Click the picture or click here to see it in high resolution.
The FDA announced an amendment regarding citizen petitions that will impact branded drug makers. A citizen petition is supposed to be submitted to the FDA if the safety or efficacy of a drug is in question. The drug is then delayed or blocked from going to market. Some companies have instead used this process as a tactic to protect sales of their drug against would-be competing biosimilars and generics. But effective January 9, 2017, a citizen petition will not be considered if the drug in question “[does] not raise valid scientific and/or legal issues.” Industry lobby group PhRMA has issued requests regarding the amendment, most of which the FDA has rejected. You can bet the battle is far from over with companies’ patents in play.